Life Without Parole for Kids Ruled Cruel and Unusual | Jackson Free Press | Jackson, MS

Life Without Parole for Kids Ruled Cruel and Unusual

Before a person under the age 18 can be given a life sentence with no hope of parole, judges must take the defendant's age and the nature of their crime into consideration.

In a 5-4 decision, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled Monday that mandatory sentences for murderers that included people under 18 was tantamount to cruel and unusual punishment.

Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr., Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito dissented.

Justice Elena Kagan, Anthony Kennedy, Ruther Bader Ginsburg and Sonia Sotomayer were in the majority.

“We therefore hold that mandatory life without parole for those under age of 18 at the time of their crime violates the 8th Amendment’s prohibition on cruel and unusual punishments,” wrote Sotomayer for the majority.

Read the full decision here.

Thanks to all our new JFP VIPs!

COVID-19 has closed down the main sources of the JFP's revenue -- concerts, festivals, fundraisers, restaurants and bars. If everyone reading this article gives $5 or more, we should be able to continue publishing through the crisis. Please pay what you can to keep us reporting and publishing.


goldeneagle97 8 years, 1 month ago

I'm glad to see this. I never understood how a minor isn't old enough to vote, drink, gamble, sign contracts or any other thing that requires you to be 18 or older, but is old enough to be tried as an adult in the legal system.

comments powered by Disqus