Lawsuit Highlights Child-Support ‘Disarray’ | Jackson Free Press | Jackson, MS

Lawsuit Highlights Child-Support ‘Disarray’

Photo by Trip Burns


Windell Blount is the lead plaintiff in a lawsuit against the Mississippi Department of Human Services that alleges sloppy management of the agency resulted in child-support orders that plaintiffs would not have otherwise had to pay.

Child custody cases are messy affairs. Take the case of Windell Blount, a May 2013 graduate of Tougaloo College, who has been embroiled in a he-said-she-said tug-of-war with his ex-wife over visitation of their 9-year-old son for about four years. Blount's ex-wife reported Blount to state officials for alleged sexual abuse of the boy when he was about 5; Blount says his son told him that someone in Blount's ex-wife's home was abusing him.

In the meantime, as a result of the allegations against Blount, the Mississippi Department of Human Services stripped him of joint custody and visitation privileges and ordered Blount to pay $588 a month in child support.

"I'm amazed," he said of the state's handling of his case. Blount contends in a federal class-action lawsuit against DHS filed April 30 that he should not have to pay the support and accuses DHS employees of conspiracy to take away his parental and constitutional rights.

Cathy Sykes, director of field operations for DHS, said she could not comment on the lawsuit. However, Sykes said the state has 360,000 child-support cases representing about $1.1 billion in child support. On average, each child-support enforcement officer handles about 1,500 cases at a given time. Sykes added that DHS' job is to collect child support, not to sort out disputes over custody or how the parent who receives the payments uses the money.

"Some absent parents want to look at it like every penny is going to the child. It is hard to convince people (that the custodial parent has) to use it to support the child," by paying rent, mortgages and utilities, Sykes said.

In early 2012, DHS' child-support enforcement division sent Blount letters saying that he owed more than $1,400 in back support. The agency's letter told him that if he failed to pay up within 15 days, DHS would report him to credit bureaus and would have his drivers' license suspended.

In December 2012, Blount reported what he called DHS' intimidation and harassment to the Federal Bureau of Investigations. Also, in 2013, a man from Albuquerque reported that Mississippi, a state where he has never lived, attempted to collect back support for a child he never fathered.

Sykes explained that the New Mexico man previously had his identity stolen by someone who lived in Mississippi. DHS eventually fixed the mistake, but somehow the New Mexico man ended up back in DHS collections system.

"I hate to say it, but it was a computer issue," Sykes, the field operations director, told the Jackson Free Press.

During this year's legislative session, lawmakers passed a bill that they believed would lower the caseload. Under the law, which was effective July 1, DHS can contract all or part of its child-support collections to private firms. That plan drew criticism from parent groups and state-worker advocates who believed that privatizing collections would make things worse, not better.

Plaintiff Christopher E. Kelly Patton believes the culture of the child-support division needs to change. He said that he began paying child support in 1998 and had never missed or been late with a payment until fall 2012. Patton said he had been sending the checks directly to his ex-wife, but when she applied for state public assistance, state law requires child-support checks to be processed through the DHS system. Patton said his wife didn't tell him she started receiving state benefits, so he continued to pay her directly.

Kelly produced a copy of a $200 check he wrote to his ex-wife in November 2012, which is included as evidence in the lawsuit. In almost 15 years of paying child support on time, the one time a question arose about his promptness, he said child-support collectors met him with "grave disrespect."

"Everyone has an adversarial attitude--as if I'm a deadbeat dad," he said.

Scarier, he said, is the thought of what would happen if, after so many years of prompt payment, he lost his job and was unable to pay. In that sense, he sympathizes with people who simply cannot afford to pay child support. Although it is possible to renegotiate child support when someone falls on hard luck, doing so requires hiring an attorney.

"If a person could pay, a person would pay," he said.

The lawsuit described in this story represents only one side of a legal dispute.

Support our reporting -- Become a JFP VIP.

The news business has changed dramatically in the past year, and we need your help more than ever to keep bringing you important stories about Jackson and the Metro. Become a JFP VIP with an annual membership or you can Sign up as a monthly supporter. Thanks for anything you can do to empower our journalism!


cris_mac3113 7 years, 3 months ago

I totally concur with this article. Child support cases handled by MS Child Support Collection and Enforcement Agency disgusts me due to my experience. I'm a single mother who had to continuously go to the agency for at least 5 years just to get a court date to get a court order for child support. You would think since I fully complied and received assistance from the state for a number of years that MDHS would have been more aggressive with my child support case. It was the exact opposite; I felt like I had to do the job of my child support case worker because I had to investigate on my own to find his current address and current job all the time. I guess I was the foolish one to think that MDHS (MS Dept. of Human Services) worked directly with MDES (MS Dept. of Employment Security) so they could be able to track any employment he had as long as I provided them with his social security number (which I did from day 1). Nonetheless, after finally going to court and receiving a court order, it has been over 2 years and I have NOT received a dime. But he (the absent/noncustodial parent) has been FREE from all methods used to collect: Income Withholding, Unemployment Intercept, Tax Offset Intercept, Contempt Action, Credit Bureau Reporting, Liens, Accounts Frozen and Seized, and License Suspension. Instead, he's a working man who lives a "carefree" life where he only has to provide for his current wife and family excluding his "outside" child whom he claims openly (legally by his signature on the birth certificate).

In addition, after being a nuisance to my case worker, the worker finally suspended his license. But this same absent/noncustodial parent was allowed to convince the case worker to reinstate his license with NO payment due to hardship; he could not find work without his CDL. After reading this article and hearing about other cases, I simply can NOT understand how this man has been able to avoid child support payments for a total of 9 years without any consequences none whatsoever. Either there are some serious malfunctions with this system of collecting and enforcing or the workers are in cahoots with him (NCP). In closing, I would love to know who I need to contact to file a complaint because my child should be entitled to his financial support and for more than 1 year of backpay.

comments powered by Disqus