JFP Person of the Day: Brad White

You know, when you lump this together with White's refusal to say anything unkind about white separatists, and his gushy praise of "lilywhites" leader Wirt Yerger (who is now one of the random talking-heads that loads up on the MSGOP web site's front page), a pattern starts to emerge.

Thanks JFP! I needed to regurgitate that deep-fried calorie ridden lunch I just had.

2010 is an off year for federal elections. The GOP hopes to use the Voter ID initiative to drive their voters to the polls in november of that year,particularly in the First Congressional District, where incumbent freshman Democrat travis childers is being challenged by alan nunnelee.If the republicans had wanted voter i d they could have voted it into law last session.instead, they held it back,in order to throw red meat to the so called base next fall.

I have no problem with voter id. Not that voter fraud a big problem but I just don't see the opposition to it. You have to show a photo id for just about everything else why not for voting?

That's smart. There are lots of Dixiecrats in District 1 who are still ticked about the end of Jim Crow, and will relish this rare opportunity to take a swipe at voting rights even if they have no idea what the bill will actually do. Gotta hand it to Brad White: he knows his base.

Bubba, there are some legitimate arguments in favor of voter ID, but I suspect most of the people who are really passionate about this issue--the people who will show up and vote just to support it--have more...general...voting-related concerns.

In Mississippi, it's so obviously racist. In Kentucky, everyone showed ID and no one complained.

Mississippi really does have far to go on race.

This literally makes my stomach turn. This voter ID plan is a thinly veiled attempt to disenfranchise voters in Mississippi. I wish the Dems spent just as much time making voting easier, with measures such as early voting.

ealy voting was included in the voter i d bill that the senate could have voted into law. the Republican leadership in the Senate rejected that provision as well.

Of course. That doesn't achieve their base's objective of suppressing black voter turnout. Hosemann gets props for at least supporting early voting as part of his proposed voter ID plan, but that's clearly not what the "lone voices crying out in the wilderness" want.

Tom- how does voter id suppress black voter turnout? Black voters don't have ids?

Folks who don't own cars, and ergo don't have reason to get driver's licenses, are far more likely to be black than white. Not likely to suppress voter turnout in urban areas, but it could hit sections of the Delta pretty hard, particularly if the alternate-ID clauses are not generous. (Hosemann, to his credit, did propose better alternate-ID standards than, say, Indiana.)

But mainly, I think what is going to stir up the Dixiecrats in District 1 is the idea of suppressing turnout, whether it actually does so or not. I will say that looking at how little it has done in other states, I would not get my hopes up too much if I were them. Then again, none of those other states are as poor, or as rural, as Mississippi.

See, despite the fact you can't open a bank account without ID, it's safe to vote without it. I suppose looking for logic in politics is pointless, but I keep hoping one day someone will surprise me.

Iron, lots of things in this country take ID to accomplish. Many forms of ID, such as a utility bill or a pay stub, are acceptable for most of those activities.

I'm at a loss, though, to find another activity that has as much at stake as voting, with such a loaded history, and that also has federal law behind it, mandating that states do everything in their power to make it as easy as possible to accomplish. That law, BTW, was enacted after states—like Mississippi—did everything in their power to disenfranchise certain specific voters.

Ultimately, IMHO, it comes down to whether voter ID will actually accomplish anything. So far, proponents have come up with such few examples of actual voter fraud that will be alleviated by this bill that the amount of energy the state GOP is expending on it is completely out of proportion. Unless, as has been suggested here, the motives have nothing to do with voter fraud at all.

I am not suggesting that voter ID is a "bad" concept. However, the Mississippi GOP is reaching for its justification, making them appear as if they simply want to make voting more difficult. Again.

I think it's all a tempest in a teapot. If we simply enforced the voter laws on the books, it would cut out a lot of fraud. Where the real crime is being committed these days is with the voter mules or "helpers". It is against current law on the books to do this. One can drive as many to the polls as they like, but it's sad to watch these paid thugs bring 50-60 elderly people in and actually go in the booth EVERY time with them and vote their vote.

I've asked out loud for years if people want to go watch this happen...no takers to date.

That's the real problem, ID is just a battle for both of the extremes to have something to fight each other over....

They have to bus them to the polls, now. Back 15 years ago, they just would have picked up cases of absentee ballots and delivered them to nursing homes, for people to sign. The operatives would simply fill them out for the democratic party, and turn them back in. Reform must have changed that one tactic.