Forum Puts Kelly on Hot Seat | Jackson Free Press | Jackson, MS

Forum Puts Kelly on Hot Seat

Dozens of citizens grilled David Kelly at Koinonia Coffee House's Friday Forum, sending the Chartre Consulting representative to the exit soon after his parting words.

Dozens of citizens grilled David Kelly at Koinonia Coffee House's Friday Forum, sending the Chartre Consulting representative to the exit soon after his parting words. Photo by Jacob Fuller.

Many west Jackson citizens and community leaders let Chartre Consulting know this morning that they are not happy with the developer's plan for a mixed-income development near Jackson State University.

David Kelly, a public relations consultant for Chartre, spoke at Koinonia Coffee House's Friday Forum about a plan to build more than 150 mixed-income townhouses along Dr. Robert Smith Sr. Parkway. Dozens of citizens, most of whom do not like the Oxford-based developer's plans, grilled Kelly with questions for more than an hour.

Friday Forum is a weekly event at Koinonia. Most speakers hang around after their parting comments to talk with participants. When Kelly was done answering questions, he quickly headed for the exit.

"In four years of Friday Forum, we've never had a speaker leave that quickly," Friday Forum organizer and mayoral candidate Jonathan Lee said.

Chartre proposes building the development on the land across Pearl Street from Koinonia, just west of Union Station. The Jackson State University Development Foundation currently owns the land. JSU Development Foundation sought out Chartre to buy the land to create the development.

Several citizens voiced concerns about the housing development not being what the people of west Jackson want as their gateway to downtown.

deborah Rae Wright, who does not capitalize her first name, started Best FOR* West, a community group specifically aimed at getting what the people want in the area of the proposed development. She said west Jackson needs more retail and economic growth. Specifically, she said the area needs a high-quality grocery store.

The city, county, state and agencies like the Jackson Redevelopment Authority should be creative and innovative with new development ideas, Wright said.

They (should not) just say, 'This is right and wrong', (but) 'This is how it can (be)," Wright said. "Jackson should not be happy about getting a new thing, be it a hotel (or) a building. It needs to be excellent and innovative. We've settled too often for getting a new something that is not innovative, that is not excellent, that doesn't make anybody want to come see it. We need to be making stuff that people get off the highway to see, because it's lit up at night. We need to have things that are made to where people from Madison are even going to come and say, 'I've got to see this.' We don't think that way."

She said that at a previous meeting with Kelly, she asked him about creating retail in the area. "He said, 'deborah, you need to keep an open mind,'" Wright said.

Lee said he was surprised Kelly showed up for the meeting, with all the negative input that citizens have been voicing.

"This is not the right development for this piece of property," Lee said.

The proposal for the development includes townhouses in three income brackets: low income, workforce and market rate. Chartre would build all the townhouses by the same specifications, Kelly said, but in groups by income bracket.

Tax Increment Financing would help fund the low-income and workforce housing, making the townhouses more affordable to residents in certain income brackets.

Chartre would own and lease out the low-income and workforce townhouses for 15 years. At the end of the 15 years, tenants would have the option to buy the townhouses from Chartre at 8-percent interest with no down payment. Tenants in workforce and low-income townhouses would be able to buy the townhouses at a reduced rate. The longer they leased the property, the less they would have to pay to purchase it.

The townhouses would be worth between $150,000 and $170,000, Kelly said. If a tenant leased a low-income property for the full 15 years, they could buy it for about $50,000.

Wright said Jackson needs economic development, not segregated housing by income. She said the area needs a development more like Full Spectrum's proposal for Old Capitol Green, which includes office space, retail and housing. It also needs a sustainable, eco-friendly development, she added.


kdavis 6 years, 2 months ago

I was going to refrain from posting my opinion on this board but this story is so typical of what is wrong with Jackson. Before anyone throws stones at me, I have lived inside the Jackson city limits since I graduated from college in 1979. I'm not someone who has fled to Madison or Rankin County, taking a pot shot at the City of Jackson. Why anyone would risk their capital by building something in Jackson is beyond my comprehension. Here we have someone who is willing to risk his capital and seems to have a well thought out plan that will work in this area of the city. If deborah Rae Wright does not like what Chartre is proposing, she should develop a business plan for what she wants and solicit the investors that will support her plan. Instead, she wants to slap someone for trying to put forth some much needed improvements in this blighted section of the city.


goldeneagle97 6 years, 2 months ago

Except for the risking capital part, I agree with everything else. I'm also trying to figure what Ms. Wright means by "segregated housing by income" because it seems that different income brackets will be a part of this development, like with the King Edward apartments. If she's concerned about the quality of the development, I get that. I'm not sure if it's in the plans, but I think it would be great if the rented units are inspected once or twice a year to be sure that tenants are taking of them, thus keeping up the value. When housing goes up, so will the number of businesses that will become attracted to the area.


Trent 6 years, 2 months ago

Mrs. Wright needs to realize that before there is any economic development in the downtown area there needs to be people living there. Why would there be a "high end grocery store" in an area with a mass exodus at 5pm when the workday is over? The overwhelming majority of people that even go downtown are commuting workers, and those people aren't going to be shopping or dining out mid-day.

The proposed mixed income housing opens the door for people that may not be able to afford the other residential buildings existing. With more residential opportunities available across all income brackets the development will follow. People don't follow around retail and businesses, it's the other way around.

comments powered by Disqus