home > Noise > Crime

Bell Denies Responsibility


Courtesy Hinds County Sheriff Department
Robbie Bell, indicted as an accessory after the fact in the murder of Heather Spencer, says Spencer was already dead when she got there. She does not say how long she was in the house with Spencer after the attack.
view larger image »

by Ronni Mott
August 13, 2008

Robbie Bell says she was not home on Trawick Drive when her son, George Bell III, raped and then bludgeoned Mary Heather Spencer with a flashlight the night of Sept. 10, 2007. So says her response to Linda Francomb’s lawsuit, which Bell’s attorney, C. Maison Heidelberg, filed in Hinds County Circuit Court July 23.

Robbie Bell was not present at the time of the violent acts of George Bell, III nor was she aware of the acts until after the fact,” the document states. She was “later informed by George Bell, III that he had killed Heather.”

On June 2, 2008, Francomb, Spencer’s mother, filed a wrongful death lawsuit against Robbie and George Bell III.

“During the late evening hours of September 10, 2007, and/or early morning hours of September 11, 2007, while Defendant Robbie Bell, George Bell, III, and Mary Heather Spencer were present, Defendant George Bell, III became enraged, and did violence to the person of Mary Heather Spencer,” the Francomb suit states. “Such violence inflicted severe, but survivable injuries upon the person of Mary Heather Spencer … (who) died as a result of the failure to receive treatment sustained as a result.”

Spencer’s family has stated repeatedly that she did not immediately die after the attack, citing a coroner’s report that allegedly states she died six or seven hours after the attack. “Had aid or assistance been furnished to Mary Heather Spencer, Mary Heather Spencer would not have died,” the suit continues.

The Bell response, however, states that Francomb has no evidence supporting the allegations that Robbie Bell was in the house when the crime occurred, or that Spencer was alive when Robbie Bell entered her home that evening. The response demands that any evidence to the contrary be produced, or Francomb’s suit should be dismissed. Because Spencer was already dead when Robbie Bell came home, the response says, Robbie Bell is not liable for Spencer’s death.

The Bell response does not specify when Robbie Bell came home that evening, or how long she was in the same house with Spencer after the attack. Nor does the Francomb suit state when Spencer died.

The Francomb suit alleges that Robbie Bell knew that her son had “severe personal and emotional problems … substance abuse disorders and addictions, and violent tendencies toward females,” and that Robbie Bell was aware of his drug use when he returned from rehab.

“George Bell, III was under the influence of mind-altering drugs at the time,” the response states, “… [and was] a threat to his own mother and to himself,” because he was also armed. “George Bell, III refused repeated requests to cease drug use and turn himself into [sic] authorities.” But the response denies that Robbie Bell was responsible for George Bell III’s actions, stating she “had no legal duty to control or prevent the acts of an adult ... .”

In response to Jackson Free Press inquires, Heidelberg provided the following statement via e-mail on behalf his client: “Shock, grief and loss have devastated both families. Robbie understands the range of raw emotions felt by many who have been affected by this tragedy, including friends and even the community, as she also suffers from these feelings.

“As to the filing of this civil lawsuit and the questions asked by the media, we do not believe it is appropriate or productive to comment. The proper venue for questions and presentation of facts is through the courts, and we will respect and follow that process.”

Police arrested George Bell III Sept. 11, 2007, after a four-hour standoff in a Northside Drive gas station. Robbie Bell was also there; questions remain as to whether she was his hostage or simply a passenger.

George Bell pleaded guilty Feb. 4, 2008, to capital murder and kidnapping, and was sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole. He had been high on cocaine the night he murdered Spencer, and said he barely remembered the events.

In October 2007, Hinds County District Attorney Faye Peterson indicted Robbie Bell as an accessory after the fact, but new DA Robert S. Smith and the attorney general’s office dropped the charges in March 2008 for lack of evidence “after an exhaustive investigation and finally, discussion with the victim’s family,” according to the attorney general’s office.

“You’d have to prove that (Robbie Bell) concealed (George Bell III), under to the statute, or otherwise assisted him with the intent to enable him to escape or avoid arrest,” said Matt Steffey, a law professor at Mississippi College. “I can understand why there might not be any good evidence that she took any actions to help him.” Robbie Bell’s failure to help Spencer—even if Spencer was alive after the attack—is not a crime, Steffey said, and does not constitute accessory after the fact. Otherwise, he said, we would all have to stop at the site of every auto accident to render aid.

It could, however, be negligence. “A civil lawsuit has a lower burden of proof,” Steffey said. “It’s more likely than not that she committed a tort,” by not giving or calling for aid, although it could be difficult to prove.

George Bell III could have been sentenced to death for his crimes, but Spencer’s family petitioned for life without parole. “We think the death penalty is too easy for him,” Francomb told WLBT after Bell’s confession. “We’d rather him spend the rest of his life with the memory of what he did to Heather.”

“I hope it torments him forever.”

Eric Stracener, Francomb’s attorney, would not comment for this story. The attorney general’s office and Robert S. Smith did not return calls.

Read the JFP's cover story about Heather Spencer's death, and Bell's earlier attack on her, here.
View PDFs of police documents on original attack here.

 
posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) on 08/13/08 at 11:40 AM. [printer version]    Share |

COMMENTS

Good luck to the Spencers. I hate having to trust Lawyers, however. I hope they win this one.

posted by Ironghost on 08/14/08 at 12:26 PM

Lawyers are sometimes good, Iron. We wrote the constitution, frequently interpret and abuse it, keep people out of jail, et al. So what if we steal, lie and cheat. All capitalists do this too. It's the Capitalistic and American way. Everybody hates us lawyers Iron until wronged or aggrieved or those jail cells start to calling. Then everybody calls us - the Cellbusters and Righters of Wrongs.

posted by Walt on 08/14/08 at 12:43 PM

Don't try to get noble on me, Walt. Lawyers also allow murders to walk free, and harass normal citizens in civil courts.

I just hope the Spencers have some success.

posted by Ironghost on 08/14/08 at 02:51 PM

What kills me about this is that, regardless of whether she is telling the truth or not, Bell does not seem to deny that she was in the home after her son brutally killed Spencer, and presumably without calling the police or an ambulance. It is shocking to the senses to hear the law professor say that isn't criminal; it rather reminds me of thing that Melton has done that people claim not to be illegal. It's easy to forget that people have to be charged with what the law specifically forbids.

But if her account is true—and we have no way at this stage of knowing whether it is or not; witnesses have been instructed not to talk to media about that night—maybe the civil route will be more conducive to justice for the Spencers.

The whole thing disgusts me. Whatever the truth is, what a fall for a woman who presented herself as so perfect.

I know she was his mother, but I can see no friggin' excuse on the planet for not calling the police or an ambulance if she knew what had happened. Humanity should trump blood at some point. Shudder.

posted by DonnaLadd on 08/18/08 at 11:55 AM

WLBT reported yesterday that George Bell has been moved from Parchman to a private prison in Wilkerson County. Anyone know anything about that prison? We need to figure out if he is getting a cushy deal.

It is simply remarkable to see how differently criminals with money (and/or white skin) can get treated. (Will the governor's mansion be next, putting him in line for a pardon like all those other domestic-abuse murderers Barbour is letting go!?!)

posted by DonnaLadd on 08/19/08 at 09:50 AM

Interesting. Most private prisons that I know about are for either medium or minimum security prisoners. I wasn't aware that people convicted of capital murder could be held at one. I have no problem with private prisons for non-violent types. Housing convicted murderers, however, is completely different.

posted by James Hester on 08/19/08 at 11:12 AM

I've never even heard of a "private" prison. Hmmm... sounds even like an oxymoron.

posted by Izzy on 08/19/08 at 11:59 AM

If you go to MDOC's web page and look under institutions you will see private, regional and state prisons, I think. It's not unusual for inmates to be moved from Parchman to private prisons. There aren't any discernable differences in the treatment. No upgrading is involvesd technically although most people consider Parchman the worse.

posted by Walt on 08/19/08 at 01:32 PM

Page 1 of 1 pages

You are not logged in. To post a comment, you must be a registered user and logged in. Click here to register or click here to log in.

Log in to JFP using Facebook

:: recentcomments

Feb 08, 2012 | 01:26 PM
Want Medicaid? Ditch the Vanity Plate
Brian C Johnson: The courts will not allow the state to drug test Medicaid recipients, so why waste money and effort on it? How exactly are single mothers--who make up the majority ...
Feb 08, 2012 | 01:19 PM
[Kamikaze] 'I'm No Token'
Duan C.: Since you guys have turned the thread into a discussion of politics. A while back during one of our meetings we discussed a coming up with a grading system for our elected officials ...
Feb 08, 2012 | 01:06 PM
Want Medicaid? Ditch the Vanity Plate
Ronni_Mott: Republican conservatives are truly confusing. Aren't they the ones who want less government regulation? I suppose that only counts if its regulating things on their ...
Feb 08, 2012 | 12:35 PM
[Kamikaze] 'I'm No Token'
Walt: Renaldo/Blackwatch you have been simply marvelous in your insight and truth telling on this piece. So glad you're back. I thought we had lost you since I didn't see your posts for so ...
Feb 08, 2012 | 12:22 PM
[Editor's Note] Aloha, Jackson
DonnaLadd: Whoops. On second reference in the above column, I said "Air Force caption" instead of Army captain. I've corrected it above.
Feb 08, 2012 | 12:12 PM
Want Medicaid? Ditch the Vanity Plate
Laurie Bertram Roberts: I will say what I said before how does he even know how someone paid for that $30 tag. It could've been a gift they may have used their tax check because ...
Feb 08, 2012 | 11:43 AM
[Kamikaze] 'I'm No Token'
DonnaLadd: Of course, people learn at different speeds; I certainly didn't learn what I know now about writing and journalism craft until I was nearly 40 (of course, that had to do as much as ...
Feb 08, 2012 | 09:56 AM
[Kamikaze] 'I'm No Token'
Kamikaze: Kudos to you and to your Prof. Cant take anything from ya. But the "problem" with the craft around here (and a LOT of things) is that eveyone considers themselves an authority. I ...
Feb 08, 2012 | 09:19 AM
[Kamikaze] 'I'm No Token'
DonnaLadd: I don't want to derail this great thread with journalism lessons, but I'll answer Brad quickly about the problems with yes-or-no questions: Sometimes you can get lucky and get a ...
Feb 08, 2012 | 05:33 AM
[Kamikaze] 'I'm No Token'
Renaldo Bryant: @Duan In my post about corporate America, I noted that social justice and equity must be the only context under which interactions and contestations must take place. Simply ...
Feb 07, 2012 | 04:41 PM
[Kamikaze] 'I'm No Token'
Kamikaze: Well, Donna, as a "good" journalist. In my day..a DAMN good one. Ive gotten plenty of broader answers by follwing up with a "why" or "why not". and honestly the WHY of Kenny Stokes ...
Feb 07, 2012 | 04:14 PM
[Kamikaze] 'I'm No Token'
Duan C.: "Also, transforming Jxn has to be a metro concern, not just a Jxn proper concern. White Flight and residential segregation must be addressed......In the Jxn metro area, they don’t ...
Feb 07, 2012 | 03:31 PM
[Kamikaze] 'I'm No Token'
DonnaLadd: No, yes-or-no questions draw completely different kinds of answers, and usually empty sound bites, thus derailing the possibility of getting an intelligent answer. Good journalists ...
Feb 07, 2012 | 03:18 PM
[Kamikaze] 'I'm No Token'
Kamikaze: Well, a why or why not follow up would take it out of the "yes or no" I think. I dont think Ward 3 needs another councilperson with a "career politician" mentality. The spectre of ...
Feb 07, 2012 | 03:01 PM
[Kamikaze] 'I'm No Token'
DonnaLadd: I'm not interested in term-limit questions, or getting anyone to pledge to them), and I try to never ask a yes-or-no question, but the other ones look good. Thanks to both of you. ...

100 recent comments »

 


click to view "flip" version of this week's print issue

 

Guests online: 285
Logged-in members: 2
Anonymous members: 2
Elapsed time: 0.8292
The most number of visitors ever was 1380 at once on 04/28/2010
currently online: Anders Ferrington  Valerie Wells

 

© Jackson Free Press, Inc. - portions of code by CC with EE. User agreement and privacy statement.
phone: 601-362-6121 (ext 11 sales, ext 16 editorial, ext 17 publisher)
fax: 601-510-9019 * P.O. Box 5067 * Jackson, MS * 39296