home > Noise > City/County> Noise

Ward 3 Race to End in Runoff


File Photo
A special election in two weeks will determine who represents Ward 3 on the City Council.

by Elizabeth Waibel
Feb. 15, 2012

Although LaRita Cooper-Stokes gained 42 percent of the votes in a special election yesterday, it wasn't enough to give her the Ward 3 City Council seat outright. She and Joyce Jackson, who received 22.6 percent of the votes, will meet up again in a runoff election Feb. 28.

The candidates are seeking the Ward 3 City Council seat that Kenneth Stokes vacated at the end of last year after he was elected to the Board of Supervisors.

The election will go to a runoff because no single candidate won more than 50 percent of the votes. The election attracted 11 candidates, and a large number of candidates makes it difficult for a single person to win an election outright.

Cooper-Stokes is the wife of Kenneth Stokes and a former candidate for justice court judge. Jackson is a former educator who is now a funeral home director and a member of the city's planning commission.

Despite the large number of candidates, the special election didn't attract many voters. Unofficial totals show that just over 2,000 people voted, but more than 14,000 people are eligible to vote in the ward.

 
posted by lizwaibel on 02/15/12 at 08:01 AM. [printer version]    Share |

COMMENTS

I went ahead and voted for Benetta Burt, though I didn't really have a particular favorite. Turnout was very light. I was #45 at my precinct and that was at 5pm.

I don't have anything against Mrs. Stokes, but I'd rather for it not to become a legacy seat, if you will. I will vote for Joyce Jackson in the runoff.

posted by golden eagle on 02/15/12 at 09:09 AM

Yeah, good luck with that golden eagle.

It seems 99.98% certain that the Stokes' Ward 3 dynasty will continue. I suppose eventually their kids will get elected to keep the family tradition going.

posted by Jeff Lucas on 02/15/12 at 09:28 AM

Sheer apathy! That's all I can say.

posted by Duan C. on 02/15/12 at 09:44 AM

It's sad that neither of the two front runners could do take to do a real interview in recent weeks. We are extending offers to both of them between now and the run-offs. If someone sees this and is working with either candidate, please have them call Jacob Fuller at 601.362.6121 ext. 22 to arrange an interview asap. We will keep trying on this end as well.

posted by DonnaLadd on 02/15/12 at 10:26 AM

This is sad. Truly sad. Thats all I can say. If 11 candidates, 6 of which were legit, THESE are the 2 that make the runoff?

posted by Kamikaze on 02/15/12 at 10:34 AM

Were there any real GOTV efforts, Brad? As you like to say, it takes more than talk.

posted by DonnaLadd on 02/15/12 at 11:43 AM

Actually Donna I saw little campaigning. Few signs. And fewer people who knew of a special election. I heard one radio spot for stokes and saw Palmet and Burt signs here and there. Low turnout surely favored those with higher name recognition. I Really thought Burt would finish top 2. But imo her finish proves that substantive issues werent touched on enough.

posted by Kamikaze on 02/15/12 at 12:05 PM

It proves not enough boots were on the ground, and that not enough people cared to put boots on the ground. It's easy to complain about Ward 3 leadership; it's harder to get over there and change it.

Not to mention, an endorsement from you and other prominent folks in the community could have helped a different candidate do better. It's not like it takes a lot of votes. Mostly what I heard were people complaining about Stokes and a lack of "leadership," but very little about who would be good and why.

If folks don't get more substance than complaining about who's already there, they just won't engage, or they will vote for who they recognize or believe they know best. This is politics 101, and something that seems to escape most folks who talk politics in the Jackson metro.

This outcome is actually what I would have predicted. People know the Stokeses, and they have helped their families individually in one way or the other, and Mrs. Jackson was a teacher. When Todd read on his phone this a.m. that it was a run-off, I responded: "I bet it's Mrs. Stokes and the former teacher."

Bingo.

posted by DonnaLadd on 02/15/12 at 12:16 PM

I actually thought Burt had more name recognition. Plus she had run against Stokes a few years back. Also heard it got "messy" dont know if that affected this turnout or not. And I dont know how many boots these candidates had on the streets. I do know there much more outside interest in this race than in any other Ward race imo. But of course those folks, myself included couldnt vote

posted by Kamikaze on 02/15/12 at 12:57 PM

I'm not shocked that Mrs. Stokes was one of the top two vote-getters, given the name recognition. I was really surprised Joyce Jackson made it. I thought someone like Benetta Burt or Albert Wilson would've made it. To tell you the truth, I almost forgot that an election was taking place until yesterday evening. There truly was a lack of publicity about it. Either that, plain apathy or both.

BTW Donna, I came by the office a week ago and dropped off a very nasty letter written about Joyce Jackson to Valerie. I'm not sure if it's anything you all want to waste any of your time looking into it, but just thought it'd be something you all might've wanted to know about.

posted by golden eagle on 02/15/12 at 02:27 PM

GE, unfortunately Id heard that it was "dirt" being passed around on several candidates. Personal things. As I said in my earlier post Id been told that the last time Burt ran that Stokes was putting out personal info on her ala The Faye Peterson incident and it went under the radar because it was Ward 3.

The fact that a LOT of people didnt even know it was a special election is a problem in and of itself. Over 11,000 folks in that ward. GE Im surprised by Jackson as well.

posted by Kamikaze on 02/15/12 at 03:04 PM

Adding to what Kamikaze said, I remember when Ms Burt ran against Stokes, how certain rumors were being spread in the community, even as far as callers to the late Mr. Tisdale's radio show trying to spread gossip about her (with Stokes not trying to discourage any of it). A very ugly race, indeed.

posted by Jeff Lucas on 02/15/12 at 03:21 PM

Speaking to the name recognition, both Mrs. Stokes and Mrs. Jackson are welll known in that community, having spent all their lives there. Larita's family is well-known and they were business owners. And Mrs. Jackson raised her family there, people know her and she taught school in the community. I wasn't suprised that those were the 2 to come out on top... If you are serious about running in Ward 3 then you have to get out and truly engage the community and press some flesh, not just talk to the voters living on the fringe of the district. And you can't start your campaign 2 weeks before the election.... BTW, a saw alot of signs out early on for Palmer, Stokes and Wilson. I didn't see Beneta Burt's signs until about 2 or 3 days before the election because we commented on how pretty they were.... I'm just saying....

posted by 833WMaple on 02/15/12 at 03:58 PM

833 Maple did either Stokes or Jackson really engage the community or was it solely on name and rep? And what kind of "engaging" was it? Just curious. And I do know that the ward now encompasses some new areas is that the fringe you speak of?

posted by Kamikaze on 02/15/12 at 05:56 PM

Page 1 of 1 pages

You are not logged in. To post a comment, you must be a registered user and logged in. Click here to register or click here to log in.

Log in to JFP using Facebook

:: recentcomments

May 25, 2012 | 02:20 PM
JRA Says Ugly Garage Ramp Must Go
justjess: Not a problem and for sure, not a priority. In an ecomomy where people are concerned about the State's infrastructure (unstable bridges, sreets in desperate need of repair ...
May 25, 2012 | 02:17 PM
BREAKING: JPS Agrees to Overhaul Discipline Policies, Settles Lawsuit
lizwaibel: Also today, the US Dept. of Education released a resource document that says restraint or seclusion does not reduce the occurrence of ...
May 25, 2012 | 09:32 AM
Bryant Signs Voter ID Bill
notmuch: I'm not sure where the "@" came from, but I think golden eagle's response was directed to me, so I will respond one more time. First, the inclusion of the word "facts" and the phrase ...
May 25, 2012 | 08:01 AM
[Dish] Cobby Williams, Young Gun
Queen601: That first question is classic! LOL
May 24, 2012 | 09:34 PM
Bryant Signs Voter ID Bill
golden eagle: @notmuch, here are some facts about voter fraud, straight from the Brennan Center's website: Fraud by individual voters is both irrational and extremely rare. Most citizens who ...
May 24, 2012 | 07:14 PM
Bryant Signs Voter ID Bill
notmuch: Oh, I have hundreds of those right-wing sites, and I couldn't say which ones are more "partisan"--they all include those pesky facts. Yes, when dead voters and multiple voters under ...
May 24, 2012 | 07:11 PM
Bryant Signs Voter ID Bill
justjess: @ golden eagle. Thanks for the spell check. I didn't just spell assassination wrong ONE time, I did it over and over. LOL! You are right on the mark; I was trying to use the word ...
May 24, 2012 | 06:46 PM
Bryant Signs Voter ID Bill
golden eagle: I don't think you could've found a more partisan right-wing site than the Daily Caller. The fact of the matter is that the right is using this issue not as a means of improving ...
May 24, 2012 | 06:10 PM
[Dish] Cobby Williams, Young Gun
trusip: WOW! was this a real interview or a joke?
May 24, 2012 | 05:00 PM
Bryant Signs Voter ID Bill
notmuch: I don't think you could have found a more liberal example of a "non-partisan" site, but even so, their evidence seems to consist of 250 carefully chosen instances in one area of ...
May 24, 2012 | 04:48 PM
Bryant Signs Voter ID Bill
golden eagle: Rather than using ideological websites to support your argument, I'll use the non-partisan Brennan Center for Justice. Really good site.
May 24, 2012 | 04:30 PM
Bryant Signs Voter ID Bill
notmuch: I might be missing something here, but I am a little confused by Golden Eagle's points: "the fact is that voter fraud is extremely rare"--so it is of no consequence that some ...
May 24, 2012 | 11:26 AM
Nick Hanauer's 'Controversial' TED Talk -- Tax the Rich?
RobbieR: TED is an elite academic conference.
May 24, 2012 | 10:18 AM
Bryant Signs Voter ID Bill
DonnaLadd: No, Darryl, no one blocked you. Stop being paranoid. We just typically open comments in moderation during non-office hours. To me, a bozo isn't someone who disagrees with me. It's ...
May 24, 2012 | 06:18 AM
Bryant Signs Voter ID Bill
Darryl: That's funny that you blocked my last comment...

100 recent comments »

 


click to view "flip" version of this week's print issue

 

Guests online: 156
Logged-in members: 0
Anonymous members: 0
Elapsed time: 0.8325
The most number of visitors ever was 1961 at once on 03/27/2012

 

© Jackson Free Press, Inc. - portions of code by CC with EE. User agreement and privacy statement.
phone: 601-362-6121 (ext 11 sales, ext 16 editorial, ext 17 publisher)
fax: 601-510-9019 * P.O. Box 5067 * Jackson, MS * 39296