home > Talk

Smoke ‘Em If You Got ‘Em

by Adam Lynch
Graphic courtesy of The Mellman Group
March 15, 2006

The Mississippi Legislature made a second attempt at tax reform this year, with the House's approval of Senate Bill 3084 on a 79 to 41 vote. The bill is an attempt at compromise after the last tax bill was vetoed by Gov. Haley Barbour.

That bill sought to eliminate the grocery tax, which at 7 percent is the nation's highest and most regressive. The bill also sought to raise the state's 18-cent-per-pack tax on cigarettes to $1 within six years.

Barbour, a former tobacco lobbyist, not only vetoed the bill, but waged a perception war, arguing that the tax cut would hurt cities and small towns across the state.

"Barbour's history as a 'no new taxes' governor certainly ran counter to his opinions on this particular tax cut," said Jim Carrington of Communities for a Clean Bill of Health, which supports the tobacco tax hike.

Lt. Gov. Amy Tuck championed the old tax bill, and asked the state tax commission to calculate whether or not cities would suffer under the reworked taxes.

Basing its calculations on annual growth over the last six years, the tax commission found that cities would suffer no fiscal damage. Barbour's office used the same set of figures, however, to predict great financial losses. Barbour's office did not reveal how exactly the governor projected such losses.

"We find that formula suspect," said Joseph Ammerman, public information spokesman for Tuck's office.

Enter the new bill last week. SB 3084 reduces the grocery tax by half, down to 3.5 percent, rather than the outright elimination the last bill contained.

Barbour sent a letter to legislators, calling even the reduced tax cut ill-timed.

"While you may consider the tax swap politically popular, I ask you to consider the revenue cut's (impact) on our ability to provide the services our citizens need," Barbour said in the letter, arguing that the state will already have to come up with millions of dollars to match federal aid for hurricane clean-up.

The State Tax Commission refuted Barbour's argument, depicting the "tax cut" as an actual tax hike. The bill would cut grocery tax revenues by $172.5 million in fiscal-year 2008, but bring in $181.5 million that same year. The bill would also impose a fee on non-settling cigarette manufacturers estimated to generate an extra $17 million in fiscal-year 2007.

Secretary of State Eric Clark said at a press conference last week that he personally wanted the tax bill to pass. "We have the highest tax on groceries in America, and we've got the next-to-the-lowest tax on tobacco in America, and this is a great bill," Clark said. "It's going to make it easier on our families to provide food and make it a discouragement to buy tobacco."

Rep. Steve Holland, D-Plantersville, said Barbour was out of touch with voters. "I'm going to say to you, Haley: If you can't sign the bill, let it become law without your signature, because the people of Mississippi have spoken as loudly on this as anything I've heard in my 23 years. Don't make a stupid political mistake," Holland demanded.

A recent poll commissioned by Communities for a Clean Bill of Health, and conducted by the Mellman Group of Washington, D.C., finds that Mississippians overwhelmingly support a hike in the cigarette tax.

The poll asked, "Would you favor or oppose an 82-cent per pack increase in the state cigarette tax as part of an effort to reduce tobacco use, particularly among kids, with the revenue dedicated toward reducing the state's 7-percent grocery tax?"

The poll found that 71 percent of Mississippi voters favored the tax, with 25 percent opposed and 4 percent undecided. The poll showed that even conservative Republicans favored the tax increase by 67 percent.

Barbour's office did not return calls for comment on the poll.

 
posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) on 03/15/06 at 05:26 PM. [printer version]    Share |

COMMENTS

Basing its calculations on annual growth over the last six years, the tax commission found that cities would suffer no fiscal damage. Barbour’s office used the same set of figures, however, to predict great financial losses. Barbour’s office did not reveal how exactly the governor projected such losses.

“We find that formula suspect,” said Joseph Ammerman, public information spokesman for Tuck’s office.


That is just crazy. I don't care what you do, two and two will never equal five.

“While you may consider the tax swap politically popular, I ask you to consider the revenue cut’s (impact) on our ability to provide the services our citizens need,” Barbour said in the letter, arguing that the state will already have to come up with millions of dollars to match federal aid for hurricane clean-up.

Nothing like a play on words to support the guys who paid you before you took office.

Unless the governor has a recipe for cigarette stir-fry or snuff pudding, he should have just not signed the bill.

posted by LatashaWillis on 03/15/06 at 08:24 PM

If your newspaper wants the truth, please look into the money behind "Communities for a Clean Bill of Health."

This is the organization that funded all the anti-Barbour radio ads.

If your paper can get to the bottom of the funding for this organization, I'll eat my hat. I suspect that Mike Moore and his "Partners" are behind the money.

HDMatthias, MD

posted by HDMatthias, MD on 03/15/06 at 10:47 PM

Page 1 of 1 pages

You are not logged in. To post a comment, you must be a registered user and logged in. Click here to register or click here to log in.

Log in to JFP using Facebook

:: recentcomments

May 25, 2012 | 02:20 PM
JRA Says Ugly Garage Ramp Must Go
justjess: Not a problem and for sure, not a priority. In an ecomomy where people are concerned about the State's infrastructure (unstable bridges, sreets in desperate need of repair ...
May 25, 2012 | 02:17 PM
BREAKING: JPS Agrees to Overhaul Discipline Policies, Settles Lawsuit
lizwaibel: Also today, the US Dept. of Education released a resource document that says restraint or seclusion does not reduce the occurrence of ...
May 25, 2012 | 09:32 AM
Bryant Signs Voter ID Bill
notmuch: I'm not sure where the "@" came from, but I think golden eagle's response was directed to me, so I will respond one more time. First, the inclusion of the word "facts" and the phrase ...
May 25, 2012 | 08:01 AM
[Dish] Cobby Williams, Young Gun
Queen601: That first question is classic! LOL
May 24, 2012 | 09:34 PM
Bryant Signs Voter ID Bill
golden eagle: @notmuch, here are some facts about voter fraud, straight from the Brennan Center's website: Fraud by individual voters is both irrational and extremely rare. Most citizens who ...
May 24, 2012 | 07:14 PM
Bryant Signs Voter ID Bill
notmuch: Oh, I have hundreds of those right-wing sites, and I couldn't say which ones are more "partisan"--they all include those pesky facts. Yes, when dead voters and multiple voters under ...
May 24, 2012 | 07:11 PM
Bryant Signs Voter ID Bill
justjess: @ golden eagle. Thanks for the spell check. I didn't just spell assassination wrong ONE time, I did it over and over. LOL! You are right on the mark; I was trying to use the word ...
May 24, 2012 | 06:46 PM
Bryant Signs Voter ID Bill
golden eagle: I don't think you could've found a more partisan right-wing site than the Daily Caller. The fact of the matter is that the right is using this issue not as a means of improving ...
May 24, 2012 | 06:10 PM
[Dish] Cobby Williams, Young Gun
trusip: WOW! was this a real interview or a joke?
May 24, 2012 | 05:00 PM
Bryant Signs Voter ID Bill
notmuch: I don't think you could have found a more liberal example of a "non-partisan" site, but even so, their evidence seems to consist of 250 carefully chosen instances in one area of ...
May 24, 2012 | 04:48 PM
Bryant Signs Voter ID Bill
golden eagle: Rather than using ideological websites to support your argument, I'll use the non-partisan Brennan Center for Justice. Really good site.
May 24, 2012 | 04:30 PM
Bryant Signs Voter ID Bill
notmuch: I might be missing something here, but I am a little confused by Golden Eagle's points: "the fact is that voter fraud is extremely rare"--so it is of no consequence that some ...
May 24, 2012 | 11:26 AM
Nick Hanauer's 'Controversial' TED Talk -- Tax the Rich?
RobbieR: TED is an elite academic conference.
May 24, 2012 | 10:18 AM
Bryant Signs Voter ID Bill
DonnaLadd: No, Darryl, no one blocked you. Stop being paranoid. We just typically open comments in moderation during non-office hours. To me, a bozo isn't someone who disagrees with me. It's ...
May 24, 2012 | 06:18 AM
Bryant Signs Voter ID Bill
Darryl: That's funny that you blocked my last comment...

100 recent comments »

 


click to view "flip" version of this week's print issue

 

Guests online: 181
Logged-in members: 1
Anonymous members: 0
Elapsed time: 0.7597
The most number of visitors ever was 1961 at once on 03/27/2012
currently online: BigBobSliz

 

© Jackson Free Press, Inc. - portions of code by CC with EE. User agreement and privacy statement.
phone: 601-362-6121 (ext 11 sales, ext 16 editorial, ext 17 publisher)
fax: 601-510-9019 * P.O. Box 5067 * Jackson, MS * 39296