home > Noise > City/County> Media Eye> media literacy

Obit for a Flaming Troll


John Bauer [Public domain], via Wikimedia Commons

by Valerie Wells
November 30, 2011

It's getting harder to comment on news stories with an anonymous post. As many readers click on links to get to stories, they have started to notice that once they get to the comments section, the site already knows who they are. This is true if you are already signed in on Facebook or Google+ and link to a story in certain national publication or even some one-person blogs.

This makes things easier and more streamlined for those who are ready to make a public observation. But for the trolls and the haters, it's a chance to rethink inflammatory words or racist talk. It may not stop uncivil discourse, but this speedbump makes a moderator's job easier.

Gannett Co. Inc. began experimenting earlier this year with Facebook logins at some of its newspapers. GannettBlog reported Oct. 31 that The News-Press in Fort Myers, Fla., and The Des Moines Register in Iowa were two of four pilot sites testing the system for comments. A week later, the trade publication Newspapers & Technology wrote that Gannett would require all posters to use a Facebook login. The Nov. 7 story also stated that for the short-term, Gannett would continue to use Pluck Media Solutions comment-management system software.

At The Clarion-Ledger, Gannett's daily newspaper based in Jackson, the transition has started. While a Facebook login is not required, yet, it is offered as an option for a new user registering to comment. New commenters can opt to register without a Facebook connection. Old posters already registered are still commenting on stories.

The Clarion-Ledger site has a link to a "frequently asked questions" page if readers want to know more about connecting to the site with Facebook, but as this issue was going to press, that question and its answer wasn't on the FAQ page, yet.

Gannett has used Demand Media-owned Pluck since 2007 for its social connection needs. The idea in its positive light was to encourage readers to create community, engage in conversation, "friend" each other and police each other. Last year, Gannett decided it was time to take a serious look at the profane, rude, abusive comments anonymous posters left. Gannett asked Pluck to moderate comments. In July 2010, Pluck used a variety of dirty-word filters and other triggers to block some comments.

The American Journalism Review noted that same month that Gannett acknowledged the problems with letting anonymous posters comment, but didn't want to let go of the practice that allows a reticent source to quietly point out an unpopular observation or fact that could get the person fired or ridiculed.

A good move for the writers happened in the last couple of years, when Gannett moved comments to separate pages at most of its newspapers' sites. Before that, no matter how good the story, a rude commenter could easily destroy the tone of the whole page. Now, The Clarion-Ledger has added a tagline to the end of its online articles, like this one at the end of a story about Monday night's hydrochloric acid spill in Pearl: "To comment on this story, call Therese Apel at (601) 961-7236."

The suggestion to call with a comment started appearing recently and has not been consistent as the daily makes this shift. If someone thinks Apel did a good job, I suggest they call her with a kind word. I'm worried too many people won't do that, but instead will call her with complaints or insults despite her working a late-night story in a potentially dangerous situation.

It's an interesting move. Of course, most readers already know they can contact the reporter, but putting the suggestion online with each story might reassure the whistleblowers hiding among the rude racists. You could call the reporter with your negative observation, but it's unlikely most people will unload profanities and hate when connecting with a real person with a name. Of course, some people will do that as well. One way to keep ugly phone calls to a dull roar is Caller ID.

Call Valerie Wells at 601-362-6121, ext. 21. Note that she has Caller ID.

 
posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) on 11/30/11 at 07:07 PM. [printer version]    Share |

COMMENTS

It's also interesting to note that The New York Times announced today that it is going to a trusted commenter system where commenters who've proved not to be trolls get in automatically and others have to be approved.

This is the system the JFP went to several years back, and it's worked wonderfully.

posted by DonnaLadd on 11/30/11 at 07:26 PM

The phone number at the end of the articles is ancient--I specifically recall it's been there since at least 2006. Maybe I read too much C-L. I remember calling a reporter with a question about an article, wanting to know why they left something out. It was about a local political candidate.

posted by David McCarty on 11/30/11 at 07:58 PM

I think I successfully got through your filters to troll the hell out of the site :)

posted by DrumminD21311 on 11/30/11 at 10:31 PM

The tag line at the end with the phone number and name has been there for at least a few years. I hate to admit I'm on there at least once a day. More during 26! They still have the link to the comment page for each article under that sentence with the phone number. I am happy they moved comments to another page. It does help me read crappy articles and think "Well, that's crappy." instead of reading a crappy article and then getting apoplectic.

posted by Lori G on 12/01/11 at 07:43 AM

I don't know if the suggestion to call the reporter has always been consistent in every story posted. It's not that new, you are right. Many papers have done this over the years, but each time there is a design change or management change, the tagline can get shifted, reworded or left off.
It's still a good idea. I wonder though if some calls should go to the editor in certain cases. I've worked with Gannett editors (and others) in the past who preferred to get any calls about stories.

posted by Valerie Wells on 12/01/11 at 09:46 AM

I thought I had seen the number at the end of stories for a long time, too. But to be honest, I don't spend that much time on their site these days, so I defer to all of you on it.

posted by DonnaLadd on 12/01/11 at 10:15 AM

Page 1 of 1 pages

You are not logged in. To post a comment, you must be a registered user and logged in. Click here to register or click here to log in.

Log in to JFP using Facebook

:: recentcomments

May 25, 2012 | 02:20 PM
JRA Says Ugly Garage Ramp Must Go
justjess: Not a problem and for sure, not a priority. In an ecomomy where people are concerned about the State's infrastructure (unstable bridges, sreets in desperate need of repair ...
May 25, 2012 | 02:17 PM
BREAKING: JPS Agrees to Overhaul Discipline Policies, Settles Lawsuit
lizwaibel: Also today, the US Dept. of Education released a resource document that says restraint or seclusion does not reduce the occurrence of ...
May 25, 2012 | 09:32 AM
Bryant Signs Voter ID Bill
notmuch: I'm not sure where the "@" came from, but I think golden eagle's response was directed to me, so I will respond one more time. First, the inclusion of the word "facts" and the phrase ...
May 25, 2012 | 08:01 AM
[Dish] Cobby Williams, Young Gun
Queen601: That first question is classic! LOL
May 24, 2012 | 09:34 PM
Bryant Signs Voter ID Bill
golden eagle: @notmuch, here are some facts about voter fraud, straight from the Brennan Center's website: Fraud by individual voters is both irrational and extremely rare. Most citizens who ...
May 24, 2012 | 07:14 PM
Bryant Signs Voter ID Bill
notmuch: Oh, I have hundreds of those right-wing sites, and I couldn't say which ones are more "partisan"--they all include those pesky facts. Yes, when dead voters and multiple voters under ...
May 24, 2012 | 07:11 PM
Bryant Signs Voter ID Bill
justjess: @ golden eagle. Thanks for the spell check. I didn't just spell assassination wrong ONE time, I did it over and over. LOL! You are right on the mark; I was trying to use the word ...
May 24, 2012 | 06:46 PM
Bryant Signs Voter ID Bill
golden eagle: I don't think you could've found a more partisan right-wing site than the Daily Caller. The fact of the matter is that the right is using this issue not as a means of improving ...
May 24, 2012 | 06:10 PM
[Dish] Cobby Williams, Young Gun
trusip: WOW! was this a real interview or a joke?
May 24, 2012 | 05:00 PM
Bryant Signs Voter ID Bill
notmuch: I don't think you could have found a more liberal example of a "non-partisan" site, but even so, their evidence seems to consist of 250 carefully chosen instances in one area of ...
May 24, 2012 | 04:48 PM
Bryant Signs Voter ID Bill
golden eagle: Rather than using ideological websites to support your argument, I'll use the non-partisan Brennan Center for Justice. Really good site.
May 24, 2012 | 04:30 PM
Bryant Signs Voter ID Bill
notmuch: I might be missing something here, but I am a little confused by Golden Eagle's points: "the fact is that voter fraud is extremely rare"--so it is of no consequence that some ...
May 24, 2012 | 11:26 AM
Nick Hanauer's 'Controversial' TED Talk -- Tax the Rich?
RobbieR: TED is an elite academic conference.
May 24, 2012 | 10:18 AM
Bryant Signs Voter ID Bill
DonnaLadd: No, Darryl, no one blocked you. Stop being paranoid. We just typically open comments in moderation during non-office hours. To me, a bozo isn't someone who disagrees with me. It's ...
May 24, 2012 | 06:18 AM
Bryant Signs Voter ID Bill
Darryl: That's funny that you blocked my last comment...

100 recent comments »

 


click to view "flip" version of this week's print issue

 

Guests online: 220
Logged-in members: 0
Anonymous members: 0
Elapsed time: 2.3029
The most number of visitors ever was 1961 at once on 03/27/2012

 

© Jackson Free Press, Inc. - portions of code by CC with EE. User agreement and privacy statement.
phone: 601-362-6121 (ext 11 sales, ext 16 editorial, ext 17 publisher)
fax: 601-510-9019 * P.O. Box 5067 * Jackson, MS * 39296