home > Noise > Capitol> State

Lawmakers Tackle Teen Pregnancy


by Lacey McLaughlin
January 13, 2011

A 13-year-old Jackson Public Schools student kisses her 30-year-old boyfriend as he drops her off at school one morning. When school officials call the teen's mother. She shows little concern saying, "He takes care of her, he helps her get the school supplies she needs."

A 12-year-old feels her baby move inside her for the first time and asks: "What I am feeling? I didn't think it would be alive until the doctor spanked it."

An 11-year-old student says she knows her 21-year-old boyfriend loves her because he said she looks good and bought her dinner at Popeye's.

As a long-time JPS educator, these are just a few of the examples of complex social issues Nancy Sylvester recalled yesterday during a joint legislative hearing on teen pregnancy at the state Capitol.

"These situations are occurring all across the state, as (they) have been for a number of years, and we are always asking, 'What do we do?,'" Sylvester told an audience of more than 50 lawmakers and citizens. "... The issues are deeper than children just wanting to be sexually active."

Sylvester, who initially advocated for abstinence-until-marriage education for the school district, says sex education needs to include information about contraceptives, but to be effective, it must also address social, emotional and mental-health issues of teens and families.

Mississippi Department of Health Officer Mary Currier also pushed for lawmakers to pass comprehensive sex-education legislation. Currier displayed data from a Department of Health survey showing 44.9 percent of Mississippi high-school students say they had sexual intercourse within the three months leading up to the survey. She recommended school districts implement programs that teach students refusal skills in nonsexual situations to sixth graders and the consequences of sex to seventh graders.

Currently, school districts are not required to teach sex education. Most follow the Mississippi Department of Education's Framework guidelines, which only teach abstinence-until-marriage and basic information about sexually transmitted diseases. School districts have the authority to adopt a sex-education policy, however, with school board approval.

Shane McNeill, director of MDE's Healthy Schools program, said only five districts in the state have sex-education policies and couldn't specify whether they required comprehensive education or abstinence-only education.

Abstinence-only advocates Larry McAdoo of Redemption Outreach Ministries and Dr. Freda Bush, local obstetrician and gynecologist, also attended the hearing and asked lawmakers to push for stronger abstinence-only until marriage policies. McAdoo pointed to a 2010 "Archives of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine" study that found that abstinence-centered sex education is more effective than comprehensive sex education. The study followed teens who participated in an abstinence program for two years and found that 67 percent of teens did not have sex compared to 48 percent of students who did not get any sex education.

James Wagoner, president of Advocates for Youths, a teen reproductive and sexual health organization, is among the many critics of the study. "There is no data in this study to support the 'abstain until marriage' programs, which research proved ineffective during the Bush administration," he told The Washington Post in February.

Still, advocates of abstinence-only programs along with some critics, hail the report as vindication for their point-of-view.

The Legislature has failed to pass sex-education bills in the past. Last year Reps. John Mayo, D-Clarksdale, and Alyce Clarke, D-Jackson, introduced House Bill 837 requiring that school districts implement either a "abstinence only" or an "abstinence plus" sex-education policy. The bill passed in the House, but died in the Senate Committee. Clarke has introduced a similar bill this year, and it currently waits for a vote in the House Education Committee.


Also see the JFP 2010 cover story "Kids Having Kids".

.

 
posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) on 01/13/11 at 01:45 PM. [printer version]    Share |

COMMENTS

The first three paragraphs make one wonder what some parents are thinking. Do they just not care?

posted by bill_jackson on 01/13/11 at 02:49 PM

I am OUTRAGED! This is the worse crap I have hear in my life. What the heck do these law makers mean about sex education? A 12 year old kissing her boyfriend who is 30 years old should have been reported to DHS because the mother is a fool and is guilty of child neglect and also child endangerment. The JPD should have been called and an arrest made for rape! How did any of the members of the Legislature listen to these stories and decide that what is needed is sex education.

I agree that our kids need to be educated on "the baby won't move until the doctor spanks it".

The Eleven Year Old (11) is dealing with a 29 year old and believes he loves her because "he bought her dinner at Popey's.

I will bet my neck that all of these stories are reports about black girls.

The meeting should have errupted in anger and the whole group should have been on the steps of DHS. I am trying to wake my body us because I know that these are not the reactions for any sane member of the Legislature to this type of blatant criminal activity! I know that I didn't just read what I read!

It is true that school districts are not required to teach sex educaton, but, they sure as hell are required to report cases of sexual abuse and child neglect.

PS. Forget "abstaining until marriage" what about abstaining until the body and mind are capable of dealing with sexual actvty and Slam it, it's not the age of 11 with a mate of 30. I am OUTRAGED!

posted by justjess on 01/13/11 at 03:10 PM

Justjess- I'm not sure what the next course of action JPS took on those matters. They may have reported it to DHS. Sylvester did not elaborate further.

posted by Lacey McLaughlin on 01/13/11 at 03:30 PM

I'm with JustJess. In fact, I'll go one step further. These men aren't boyfriends; they're pedophiles--sexually attracted to very young children. THe pregnancy is ipso facto evidence of statutory rape. Every one of these men should be up on child molestation charges--and certainly shouldn't be dropping their victims off at school. It's one thing if we're talking about teenagers having sex with each other--they need all the sex education they can get. But these stories are about predators on children-it shouldn't even be discussed as "teen sex."

posted by JDLW on 01/13/11 at 03:46 PM

Surprisingly, not a damn one of those stories sounds out of the norm to me for the kids that I see.

80% of the girls I've worked with in the past year that were 12-17 have had an incidence of chlamydia or gonorrhea (so many that I learned how to spell them damn words) in the 90 days previous to getting into our program. NONE of them understood that if they got treated but their boyfriend did not, they would once again catch the STD.

It is AMAZING the things that our girls do not know about their bodies and the sexual development process (as well as pregnancy).

I've been screaming that for years. Also, I think Dr. Bush is off her rocker.

posted by Lori G on 01/13/11 at 04:13 PM

I support full education on all matters of biology - both STDs and pregnancy prevention, and sooner rather than later.

posted by Izzy on 01/13/11 at 04:30 PM

Page 1 of 1 pages

You are not logged in. To post a comment, you must be a registered user and logged in. Click here to register or click here to log in.

Log in to JFP using Facebook

:: recentcomments

May 25, 2012 | 02:20 PM
JRA Says Ugly Garage Ramp Must Go
justjess: Not a problem and for sure, not a priority. In an ecomomy where people are concerned about the State's infrastructure (unstable bridges, sreets in desperate need of repair ...
May 25, 2012 | 02:17 PM
BREAKING: JPS Agrees to Overhaul Discipline Policies, Settles Lawsuit
lizwaibel: Also today, the US Dept. of Education released a resource document that says restraint or seclusion does not reduce the occurrence of ...
May 25, 2012 | 09:32 AM
Bryant Signs Voter ID Bill
notmuch: I'm not sure where the "@" came from, but I think golden eagle's response was directed to me, so I will respond one more time. First, the inclusion of the word "facts" and the phrase ...
May 25, 2012 | 08:01 AM
[Dish] Cobby Williams, Young Gun
Queen601: That first question is classic! LOL
May 24, 2012 | 09:34 PM
Bryant Signs Voter ID Bill
golden eagle: @notmuch, here are some facts about voter fraud, straight from the Brennan Center's website: Fraud by individual voters is both irrational and extremely rare. Most citizens who ...
May 24, 2012 | 07:14 PM
Bryant Signs Voter ID Bill
notmuch: Oh, I have hundreds of those right-wing sites, and I couldn't say which ones are more "partisan"--they all include those pesky facts. Yes, when dead voters and multiple voters under ...
May 24, 2012 | 07:11 PM
Bryant Signs Voter ID Bill
justjess: @ golden eagle. Thanks for the spell check. I didn't just spell assassination wrong ONE time, I did it over and over. LOL! You are right on the mark; I was trying to use the word ...
May 24, 2012 | 06:46 PM
Bryant Signs Voter ID Bill
golden eagle: I don't think you could've found a more partisan right-wing site than the Daily Caller. The fact of the matter is that the right is using this issue not as a means of improving ...
May 24, 2012 | 06:10 PM
[Dish] Cobby Williams, Young Gun
trusip: WOW! was this a real interview or a joke?
May 24, 2012 | 05:00 PM
Bryant Signs Voter ID Bill
notmuch: I don't think you could have found a more liberal example of a "non-partisan" site, but even so, their evidence seems to consist of 250 carefully chosen instances in one area of ...
May 24, 2012 | 04:48 PM
Bryant Signs Voter ID Bill
golden eagle: Rather than using ideological websites to support your argument, I'll use the non-partisan Brennan Center for Justice. Really good site.
May 24, 2012 | 04:30 PM
Bryant Signs Voter ID Bill
notmuch: I might be missing something here, but I am a little confused by Golden Eagle's points: "the fact is that voter fraud is extremely rare"--so it is of no consequence that some ...
May 24, 2012 | 11:26 AM
Nick Hanauer's 'Controversial' TED Talk -- Tax the Rich?
RobbieR: TED is an elite academic conference.
May 24, 2012 | 10:18 AM
Bryant Signs Voter ID Bill
DonnaLadd: No, Darryl, no one blocked you. Stop being paranoid. We just typically open comments in moderation during non-office hours. To me, a bozo isn't someone who disagrees with me. It's ...
May 24, 2012 | 06:18 AM
Bryant Signs Voter ID Bill
Darryl: That's funny that you blocked my last comment...

100 recent comments »

 


click to view "flip" version of this week's print issue

 

Guests online: 219
Logged-in members: 1
Anonymous members: 0
Elapsed time: 0.9602
The most number of visitors ever was 1961 at once on 03/27/2012
currently online: golden eagle

 

© Jackson Free Press, Inc. - portions of code by CC with EE. User agreement and privacy statement.
phone: 601-362-6121 (ext 11 sales, ext 16 editorial, ext 17 publisher)
fax: 601-510-9019 * P.O. Box 5067 * Jackson, MS * 39296