The peer-review process failed to identify significant, disqualifying problems with a controversial and widely publicized study that seemed to raise doubts about the parenting abilities of gay couples, according to an internal audit scheduled to appear in the November issue of the journal, Social Science Research, that published the study. The highly critical audit, a draft of which was provided to The Chronicle by the journal’s editor, also cites conflicts of interest among the reviewers, and states that “scholars who should have known better failed to recuse themselves from the review process.” Since it was published last month, the study, titled “How Different Are the Adult Children of Parents Who Have Same-Sex Relationships?,” has been the subject of numerous news articles and blog posts. It has been used by opponents of same-sex marriage to make their case, and it’s been blasted by gay-rights activists as flawed and biased.(The Chronicle of Higher Education)
July 30, 2012
blog home: OUTLAWBLOG » 
Tweets
-
May 18, 5:25 p.m. on Lumumba Rocks the House at Mayoral Debate
-
May 18, 4:36 p.m. on Attorney Herb Irvin's Open Letter to Jonathan Lee
-
May 18, 4:31 p.m. on Lumumba Rocks the House at Mayoral Debate
-
I believe he had a white grandfather, but will check again.
May 18, 4:26 p.m. on Lumumba Rocks the House at Mayoral Debate
-
May 18, 4:12 p.m. on Lumumba Rocks the House at Mayoral Debate
Comments
Use the comment form below to begin a discussion about this content.
Sign in to comment