jackson weather: 55f (13c)

by Adam Lynch
July 17, 2009
The Hinds County Circuit Court has granted the wife of former Republican U.S. Rep. Chip Pickering her motion to protect documents related to her divorce in Madison County Chancery Court.
Leisha Jane Pickering filed a July 14 complaint for alienation of affections against Jackson resident Elizabeth Creekmore-Byrd--a member of the affluent Creekmore family, who are founders of the Cellular South phone company--and several relatives who she claims donated to her husband while he was in Congress and who acted to cover PickeringA's alleged philandering. Leisha Pickering also filed a motion for temporary restraining order against her former attorney Bettie Ruth Johnson, so that Chip Pickering's journals and documents, obtained during the course of Pickering's divorce, may be preserved and used in the subsequent alienation of affection civil suit she filed against Creekmore-Byrd.
Chip Pickering, a father of five, was one of Congress' more conservative Republicans, voting with President George Bush nearly 98 percent of the time. He ran on a platform of family values and fiscal conservatism during his stint as a U.S. Congressman. He now serves as senior consultant for Mississippi Energy Policy Institute and a lobbyist with Capitol Resources, in Jackson--which lobbies for Cellular South. The congressman kept personal records of his alleged sexual exploits with Creekmore-Byrd, which his wife obtained and sought to use during the July divorce. Chip Pickering's lawyers filed a successful motion during a July 7 divorce court hearing in Madison County Chancery Court to remove from his wife the journals, which the court deemed improperly obtained.
The court also demanded that Leisha Pickering share none of the allegedly damning information with her new attorney, who was unidentified at the time of the July 7 hearing but is now known to be former Supreme Court Justices Chuck McRae and Oliver Diaz.
Leisha Pickering states in the motion that if the documents are turned over to Pickering's attorney, without protection, they could be destroyed.
Pickering filed the temporary restraining order in Hinds County Circuit Court, which ordered Ruth Johnson to turn over copies of all documents to Hinds County, place them under seal, and file them personally with the court. The court will hold the documents until a final order is entered in the Pickering divorce case in Madison.
Attorneys are disagreeing over Madison Chancery Court Judge Cynthia Lee Brewer's decision to lock away the relevant journals and notes that could dash the defense of a woman who allegedly stole Chip Pickering from his wife.
One Jackson attorney, speaking anonymously, called Brewer's decision troubling because of the potential violation in attorney-client privilege it represents.
"The court seemed in awe of Chip Pickering," said the attorney, "like they had decided that were going to do everything to help him out. This was blatantly wrong. This is the type of thing judicial performance jumps all over. Of their own (volition), they should jump all over this."
Local attorneys say the most egregious violation appeared to be the court's decision to deprive Leisha Pickering of relevant information that could make or break her case, and that any attorney helping Leisha Pickering would be undermined by the absence of the information.
"How could you make any arguments in court without the documents to back them up?" asked one attorney familiar with the case. "The legs would be cut out from under them."
Leisha Pickering claims in a court filing that she was represented in Madison Chancery Court matter by Ruth Johnson, though Ruth Johnson had told the court that she would no longer be representing Leisha Pickering. The situation, argue some lawyers, essentially deprived her of an attorney with an investment in the case, who may have fought harder to maintain the documents.
"First, you got the problem with the allegations, but what happened in Madison was a travesty. She was essentially there without representation. They were questioning her without her attorney," said another attorney.
Brewer told Leisha Pickering that she could be "guilty of or may be cited for some issuance of contempt," if she shared the information gleaned from the journals with another lawyer.
Pickering, who is not a lawyer, pointed out that the information could prove relevant: "... (A)ll the information I know about my husband's behavior has come through what I found out over a year ago, and I think that anyone in my situation and my position would be looking at any other--whether it's finding love letters or anything."
Brewer: "Ma'am. Ma'am, please."
Pickering: "I'm just trying to understand."
Brewer: "Ma'am, you know what you may have gleaned from the things that now must be returned. You know where you received those things, how you received those. So you will be on your honor not to discuss the contents thereof. You may discuss anything else, but you are on your honor not to discuss those things that you gleaned from the documents that must now be returned."
Mississippi College School of Law Professor Matt Steffey told the Jackson Free Press that he did not feel Judge Brewer's decision was protectionist toward Chip Pickering.
"She employed a special master to look at it and make recommendations. She followed a retired chancellor's recommendation and moved forward.
It's not the judge's fault that Pickering was between attorneys. This is not a criminal case," Steffey said. "I would want strong evidence, as yet not manifest, before I would accuse a judge of behaving unethically. The judge has to rule for either one person or another, and if the documents were improperly returned then they need to be returned."
Read the restraining order
COMMENTSBTW, we corrected the above story just now to say that Creekmore-Byrd is a Jackson resident. Adam originally said she was a Madison resident. We apologize.
posted by ladd on 07/17/09 at 12:37 PM
This is getting juicy. So now, we have our own version of Mark Sanford and John Ensign. This is only going to get hotter than the 88 degrees that's showing at the top of the page.
posted by golden eagle on 07/17/09 at 12:43 PM
I take it that Brewer is the Madison chancery judge? It's not clear above. And what's her first name? I know this story is developing fast.
posted by Brian C Johnson on 07/17/09 at 03:22 PM
Brian, It's Madison Chancery Court Judge Cynthia Lee Brewer. I've corrected the story. Thanks for catching it.
posted by Ronni M on 07/17/09 at 04:47 PM
Funny, I told someone here earlier that Pickering would release any of his comments through Mississippi GOP apologist Sid Salter. Lo and behold. In Pickering's statement, he hints that Leisha is at "fault," but doesn't say how:
"My marriage to Leisha is irreparably damaged. For the sake of our boys, I have done my best to resolve our differences amicably, fairly and privately, but without success, as Leisha refused to cooperate in any form or manner and is now on her third attorney. In June, I filed for divorce on a fault basis; previously, I had filed on the basis of irreconcilable differences because I thought that was in the best interest of our boys. Leisha’s Complaint is a reaction to my filing on fault grounds. I still believe it is in the best interest of our five (5) boys if our differences are resolved privately and before the appropriate court and not in the media. For that reason, I will not comment further."
Jim Craig's questions, at that link, are interesting:
1. If Mr. Pickering "previously . . . filed [for divorce] on the basis of irreconcilable differences," why did he change the filing to one alleging fault?
[...]
2. I find it interesting that Mr. Pickering, rather than Ms. Byrd, has responded to the filing of a complaint against Ms. Byrd.
3. I also find it interesting that unlike Gov. Sanford, Mr. Pickering is making no statement of remorse or even equivocation regarding the scandal.
posted by ladd on 07/17/09 at 05:48 PM
And Eichelberger has a fascinating post about following the money, which could answer the question about why the public should pay attention.
Good work over there you want see on the other personal blogs in the area that will only question one side.
And all the talk from Pickering about what's in the best interest of his boys at this stage may elevate him to the cad level of a John Edwards if he's not careful. Not quite there, but climbing.
posted by ladd on 07/17/09 at 05:51 PM
posted by C.W. on 07/18/09 at 07:35 AM
posted by Walt on 07/18/09 at 03:33 PM
Here is Beth Creekmore Byrd doing good works at Hospice Ministries. What a hypocrite! See page 3 of the pdf:
http://hospiceministriesweb.org/Spring%2009.2web.pdf
posted by blu_n_a_redstate on 07/18/09 at 06:14 PM
posted by baquan2000 on 07/20/09 at 10:02 AM
Has anyone delved into C-street house and the evangelical "Family" that runs it?
http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2009/jul/19/behind-closed-doors-c-street/
Scary stuff.
posted by Blackwatch on 07/20/09 at 03:08 PM
posted by Ronni M on 07/20/09 at 04:01 PM
Facing South did a story on the C Street house earlier this month, Blackwatch, and journalist Jeff Sharlet wrote a book about The Family, which owns the house.
I agree ... truly scary stuff. The group seems themselves as "chosen" and above the law. Here's a bit from the Facing South story, which was about Sanford:
During the interview with Gross, Sharlet noted The Family's emphasis on the biblical King David story that Sanford referenced. In that tale, David sees the beautiful Bathsheba, decides he must have her, gets her pregnant, arranges to have her husband killed in battle, and then marries her. Asked by Gross whether he had a better understanding of the Sanford affair because he studied The Family, Sharlet pointed to the governor's King David reference:
"That's actually one of the sort of core parables of The Family that I encountered, and describe this experience with David Coe, the son of Doug Coe, the leader, came around and gave us this long lesson. He says, 'What made King David great?' And the men I was with are all trying to say, 'Well, he loved God,' all this. He [says], 'No, No, that's not it. King David was a terrible man. You know, he was an adulterer and a murderer. So why is he a hero of the Bible?' And the answer is because God chose him. King David is beyond morality, in their limited understanding of scripture. ... I could almost hear Doug Coe's voice when Gov. Sanford was saying, 'I need to keep governing, because I'm like King David.'"
posted by Ronni M on 07/20/09 at 04:11 PM
Yo my good buddy, Iron, I couldn't find the article where you complimented me on my sanity and marvelous humor. However, I wish we had the occasion to have a psychologist or psychiatrist read both of our comments and professionally decide which one of us is psychotic. Since I can't dispute the claim, I'm not offended. I don't offend easily. You're still my dog, though, and I can't wait to read more of your thought-provoking and edifying commentary. Cheers.
posted by Walt on 07/22/09 at 05:02 PM
I couldn't find the article where you complimented me on my sanity and marvelous humor
posted by Ironghost on 07/22/09 at 06:56 PM
Noticed a Pickering story on The Daily Beast, Morning Scoop - The Secret GOP Sex Diary by Max Blumenthal. Religion, sex, money & politics. This situation reads like a cross between a Tennessee Williams story and The Young & the Restless.
posted by Bourree' on 07/24/09 at 08:36 AM
This type of thing is universal to politics, but it always amuzes me how Republicans get away with trying to claim moral superiority when it comes to issues like this? How could a group of lawmakers live together and a good number of them have these types of issues and nobody really know?
posted by Goldenae on 07/24/09 at 10:22 AM
Page 1 of 1 pages
Dec 12, 2009 - This performance by Kate Campbell and John McCutcheon benefits Mississippi's Ronald McDonald House. more