home > Noise > City/County> Melton

Council Votes to Pay Bodyguards’ Legal Fees


Kenya Hudson
Jackson City Council voted to pay legal bills for former Mayor Frank Melton's bodyguards Marcus Wright, pictured, and Michael Recio for their 2007 state trial.

by Adam Lynch
December 1, 2009

The Jackson City Council agreed to finally pay attorney's fees for former city employees Marcus Wright and Michael Recio today. Former bodyguards of deceased Mayor Frank Melton, both men were with Melton when he oversaw the illegal demolition of a home on Ridgeway Street in 2006.

Both pleaded guilty in federal court for their actions related to the demolition—Wright pleaded guilty and cooperated with prosecutors in the weeks leading up to the February trial, while Recio pleaded guilty after Melton's death in May. The city is not obligated to pay court fees for city employees when city attorneys find they have acted outside the scope of their employment duties (a determination that often follows a successful court conviction). Prior to the federal trial, however, a Hinds County Circuit Court jury found all three men, including Melton, innocent of all charges related to the same destruction. The attorneys' fees concern the state trial, but the council had doubts considering the bodyguards' federal guilty pleas. The council refused with a 3-to-3 vote last October to pay the $150,000 bill for Melton's 2007 state legal fees, although it agreed in a 3-to-2 vote this June to pay his $37,000 bill for representation in the federal trial.

Council members, including Ward 7 Councilwoman Margaret Barrett-Simon and former Councilmen Leslie McLemore and Marshand Crisler, had argued in the years leading up to the federal trial that the bodyguards' defense attorneys were charging an exorbitant amount for services when all they really did, according to McLemore, was "follow the lead" of Melton's attorney Dale Danks. The council voted down a similar authorization vote to pay legal fees last year.

City Attorney Pieter Teeuwissen said the lawyers had agreed this year to accept a reduced fee that amounted to one-third of their original charges—$7,500 for Recio's lawyer, current Hinds County District Attorney Robert Smith, and $10,000 for Wright's attorney, current Hinds County Assistant District Attorney Winston Thomas.

Wiell suggested referring both matters to the council's Rules Committee, but Council President Frank Bluntson, an unwavering Melton supporter who had defended the payment of Melton's fees in 2008, said he was eager to settle the issue in favor of paying the attorneys.

"This is the will of the chair," Bluntson said. "If you want to vote against the chair, you're welcomed to do this, but the chair is willing to move on with this. We have the city attorney making a recommendation for us, and we should do this."

The council voted 4-to-1 in the settlement of fees for Wright and 5-to-1 in favor of Recio's fees, with Weill voting against the authorization in both votes. Councilman Charles Tillman was not available for the first vote, while Barrett-Simon did not attend the council meeting this morning.

Weill, who is still concerned about paying the fees following the bodyguards' guilty pleas in federal court, said he was working with council members and city legal "to come up with a policy to address these issues in the future."

"We don't have a rough draft, but we should have one the first of the year as we go through the process," Weill said.

Ward 3 Councilman Keneth Stokes, who had also supported paying the fees last year, said he wanted the city to remain consistent concerning the issue.

"I would hope that consistency would be the order of the day. If we've been paying them in the past then we must continue paying them. If we're not, then let's not. We can't pay for Joe and not for Al," Stokes said.

 
posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) on 12/01/09 at 02:20 PM. [printer version]    Share |

COMMENTS

This was the right thing to do. Thumbs up to the council. Whether you agree or disagree with the actions of Recio and Wright; the city has had a policy of paying such fees. This is good because it allows employees to get private counsel in situations where the city may not want to represent them directly.

posted by Powerman on 12/01/09 at 02:40 PM

In my opinion, and in the opinion of several lawyers I have discussed this with, by paying the legal fees of Melton and Co., the Council has given tacit approval to the actions of Melton and Co., leaving COJ more vulnerable to higher civil penalties. Tacit approval, in my opinion, means that the elected Council body that has has FINAL oversight and supervision of the staff of the COJ's administrative arm, the Mayor's Office, has stated unequivically that Melton and Co were acting with the full approval of COJ and the Council. By not approving the payments, they could at least argue that Meltonand Co. were acting outside of their official capacties as COJ employees, (i.e. rogue actors).

Good thing Lumumba is now a council person. An attorney of his caliber and expertise would have a field day and a hugh pay day with the claims of the owners of the Ridgeway property and the Upper Room.

The actual property damage penalties would probably be minimal, but the punitive damages could be record breaking.

Again, all in my opinion.

I have written,
discussed, and received written responses on my opinion with several past and present Council members and at least three of them agreed with my assessment.

To say Melton and Co. should be reimbursed for their legal fees due to a so called unwritten COJ Council policy is, in my opinion, not good or logical stewardship of COJ and citizen resources.

Didn't any of the Council persons put this question to the Mayor and the City Attorney, in writting, for a written opinion. There's an old adage "if it isn't written down, it never happened".

The Mississippi Supreme court has ruled that the only Jacksonians with legal standing to ask this question would be our Council representatives.

In fact the Council persons might be made indivdual parties to any litigation. I recommend that the Council, in their new and upcoming policy try to make COJ liable for any judgements against them as as individuals as they perform their duties as Council persons. Of course if they do try to do this, I would consider this an acknowledgement that they know they have placed COJ and themselves in jeopardy and they are now attempting to imdenify themselves, maybe even retroactively.

Kenny Stokes has made it known that this is why he USED to never vote to approve the COJ payment docket as he didn't want to be held personally responsible for the actions of the Mayor's staff, including the City Attorney, without the Council being given independent legal advice.

Can any legal eagles out their provide a more credible assessment tahn mine of the possible and probable financial damage this vote could subject COJ and the Council to? I am definitely an amateur when it comes to the law.

posted by FrankMickens on 12/01/09 at 07:02 PM

I will be calling my councilman yarber to let him know that, while he agrees to pay for criminals south Jackson could have used that money to mentor young black males. Even help some to get their GED.

posted by NewJackson on 12/01/09 at 08:31 PM

Page 1 of 1 pages

You are not logged in. To post a comment, you must be a registered user and logged in. Click here to register or click here to log in.

Log in to JFP using Facebook

:: recentcomments

Feb 10, 2012 | 02:12 PM
Holland's Gulf of America Bill Sweeping the Nation
DonnaLadd: Thanks, Maddow, for the credit and the link love for this post: on.msnbc.com/yflZ4j
Feb 09, 2012 | 09:50 PM
Biz Roundup: Welcoming New Businesses to Town
redlion: Interesting story. I actually patronized one of Scott's stores during a recent six week stay in the DC area. Still have a re-useable shopping bag from there. Had ...
Feb 09, 2012 | 04:55 PM
[Outlaw] A More Perfect Union
thabian: Loved this column not only for the very important subject matter, but because it contained a truly entertaining voice. I wanted to read more!!!!
Feb 09, 2012 | 04:35 PM
Holland's Gulf of America Bill Sweeping the Nation
DonnaLadd: Let's not forget when Rep. Holland tried to ban abortion back in 2006. Many of us weren't laughing about that stunt. Here's a 2010 report on him and a ...
Feb 09, 2012 | 04:15 PM
Holland's Gulf of America Bill Sweeping the Nation
Jason Meeks: brief mention of it in video :) by Colbert (via Twitter trending) http://tpmmuckraker. talkingpointsmemo.com/201 2/02/mississippi_rep_want ...
Feb 09, 2012 | 04:01 PM
Holland's Gulf of America Bill Sweeping the Nation
DonnaLadd: Oh, and I love it when Mississippi punks the nation.
Feb 09, 2012 | 03:57 PM
Holland's Gulf of America Bill Sweeping the Nation
DonnaLadd: I'm surprised anyone took it seriously. We heard about it earlier the week, and it seemed obvious before it was Holland. But we all deal with him. I'll ...
Feb 09, 2012 | 03:40 PM
Holland's Gulf of America Bill Sweeping the Nation
Lori G: I thought it was genius when I saw it. Of course, I knew the Colbert joke. I think that is the problem. In this state, there just aren't enough people that ...
Feb 09, 2012 | 03:20 PM
Holland's Gulf of America Bill Sweeping the Nation
DonnaLadd: I can totally see Holland on Colbert, both pretending to be conservatives! Ha!
Feb 09, 2012 | 03:16 PM
Fight the Power
rlnave: Attorney General Jim Hood was worried for nothing. Even though he was at the Supreme Court making arguments in the ongoing pardon case this morning, I'm hearing that Jackson Democratic Rep. ...
Feb 09, 2012 | 03:16 PM
Holland's Gulf of America Bill Sweeping the Nation
Lori G: This is an old Colbert joke! I wish someone would send this to Colbert. I swear, I think he'd cover it.
Feb 09, 2012 | 03:02 PM
[Editor's Note] Aloha, Jackson
DonnaLadd: By the way, I looked up an image of the patch our captain friend gave us. Apparently, he is with the 25th Infantry Division; read more here.
Feb 09, 2012 | 01:23 PM
Biz Roundup: Welcoming New Businesses to Town
DonnaLadd: Case in point from the Christian Science Monitor: Whole Foods Killing off Small Natural Food Stores: After years of delivering organic produce to health-food ...
Feb 09, 2012 | 01:19 PM
Biz Roundup: Welcoming New Businesses to Town
DonnaLadd: This is a mixed blessing. They sell cool stuff, but they could shut McDade's and Rainbow down if we're not all careful about where we spend all our food money. ...
Feb 09, 2012 | 01:08 PM
[Outlaw] A More Perfect Union
DonnaLadd: Amazing column.

100 recent comments »

 


click to view "flip" version of this week's print issue

 

Guests online: 177
Logged-in members: 1
Anonymous members: 0
Elapsed time: 0.6060
The most number of visitors ever was 1661 at once on 02/10/2012
currently online: davidmayes

 

© Jackson Free Press, Inc. - portions of code by CC with EE. User agreement and privacy statement.
phone: 601-362-6121 (ext 11 sales, ext 16 editorial, ext 17 publisher)
fax: 601-510-9019 * P.O. Box 5067 * Jackson, MS * 39296