home > Noise > Pearl River

McGowan Funding Initial One-Lake Study


File photo
John McGowan, Pearl River Vision Foundation founder, is promoting a one-lake development.

by Donna Ladd
Aug. 8, 2011

The Pearl River Vision Foundation is paying for the initial study of a one-lake flood-control development along the Pearl River, the group's founder John McGowan said today. "We're going to fund it up until the point it becomes a Corps project," McGowan said after the monthly, Rankin-Hinds Pearl River Flood and Drainage Control District, or Levee Board, meeting at Flowood City Hall. "Me, mainly, with maybe some funding from other private entities," McGowan said.

"We're just trying to get started. I think a few hundred thousand more would get us through."

McGowan said his engineers did much of the study of a possible lake, running from just above Lakeland Drive to the bottom of downtown Jackson, during the years that his team prepped his long-time vision of a Two Lakes project, which would have taken the top lake up to the Ross Barnett reservoir. The Levee Board voted to reject that plan last year in favor of expanded levees, a recommendation of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers in Vicksburg.

After Two Lakes fell out of favor, McGowan and his team came up with a scaled-back plan that, they say, would be more environmentally attractive, less expensive and would not flood LeFleur's Bluff State Park, all major sticking points with the Two Lakes concept. McGowan promised today to provide maps of the proposed lake to the Jackson Free Press this week. The JFP recently saw the map in McGowan's office, but has not yet received a map to share with the public.

Earlier this year, McGowan's earlier Two Lakes of Mississippi Foundation was retooled into the Pearl River Vision Foundation, and the Levee Board voted to get behind the new compromise plan. McGowan has told the Jackson Free Press that the new plan would allow the second lake to be added to the north of the one-lake plan at a later date, should there be will to do it at a later time.

Section 211 of the federal Water Resources Development Act of 1996 requires four steps for a Corps-directed civil-works project such as that envisioned by the Pearl River Vision Foundation. The foundation is working with the Levee Board to operate as what federal law calls a "nonfederal sponsor," to share a portion of study and construction costs, as well as operation and maintenance expenses once the project is completed.

Foundation and McGowan spokesman Dallas Quinn briefed the Levee Board today on where the process stands, informing them that a meeting with the Corps in Vicksburg originally scheduled in July has now been moved to Aug. 25. At that meeting, the foundation hopes to agree on an agreement with the Corps on the project proceeding.

After the Corps meeting in August, the foundation hopes to begin the second phase of the required five-step process, Quinn said: the feasibility study. They have already completed phase 1, Reconnaissance, he said. At that stage, the sponsor must investigate the nature of water resource problems and assess the federal government's interest, as well as examine the interests of nonfederal sponsors. Only 16 of every 100 reconnaissance studies lead to constructed projects, the Congressional Research Service reports.

Once the Corps recommends proceeding, the foundation will begin its feasibility stage. "The objective of the feasibility study is to formulate and recommend solutions to the water resources problem identified in the reconnaissance phase," CRS explains.

During the feasibility phase, the Vicksburg Corps district would develop alternative plans, study engineering feasibility of the one-lake project, conduct a cost-benefit analysis and assess environmental impact under the National Environment Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA). After that study, the Corps would decide whether or not the one-lake project should continue to get federal investment.

The Corps also determines how construction costs would be split between the federal government and the local sponsor. The share of federal money leans heavily toward navigation, food and hurricane damage reduction and ecosystem restoration, the CRS reports.

If the Corps approves the project, its Chief of Engineers signs off on a Chief's Report, which goes to Congress and the Office of Management and Budget for approval.

Should the one-lake proposal survive the feasibility phase, it would enter the Engineering and Design study phase, which takes two years, on average, and usually happens as the sponsors seek congressional approval and funding. At that stage, costs that the local sponsor initially paid in the process then can be refunded due to the split that the federal government establishes. The final stage is construction, once all approvals and changes to the original plan are put into place.

Quinn said after the Levee Board meeting today that the foundation hopes to show the Corps on Aug. 25 that, "yes, the project is technically feasible and will be environmentally acceptable."

Read more about Pearl flood-control efforts here.

Correction and clarification: McGowan and PRVF spokesman Dallas Quinn emailed that their authority to operate is under Section 211 of WRDA 1996, not WRDA 2000. He said that the foundation plans to fund the feasibility study and Environmental Impact Statement (to a permitting stage) with its own funds and does not plan to cost share either with the Corps of the Local Sponsor (Levee Board). He also clarified that the foundation is meeting with the Corps' new personnel in Vicksburg to "discuss the process moving forward." They don't plan to prove at the August meeting that the project is technically or environmentally feasible, he said. That will come later. The above copy has been tweaked to reflect these updates.

 
posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) on 08/08/11 at 11:57 AM. [printer version]    Share |

COMMENTS

I just appended a correction and a clarification to above story.

posted by DonnaLadd on 08/08/11 at 03:59 PM

Am I the only person who is questioning why McGowan's group is in charge of the feasibility study? Do you really believe the tax payers can get an unbiased study from them? Everyone knows of McGowan's interest in ths project. If he is paying for the study and his people are performing it, do you really think the study will say anything that is unfavorable to McGowan's point of view? This feasibility study should be done by an outside third part who has no dog in the hunt. That is the only way I believe we can get an honest study. That is the only way the citizens in the area can get the most viable plan for flood control.

posted by wellington on 08/09/11 at 08:54 AM

No, I find it a bit curious, too, wellington. I'm supposed to talk to the foundation's attorney tomorrow on why they believe the conflict of interest doesn't affect Mr. McGowan and his associates (who own land that would be affected positively by the project). I've been trying to talk to him for a while now about it (to his defense, he was on his honeymoon).

It is also important to note that the Corps has not signed off on this, yet, although the Levee Board seems fine with it.

posted by DonnaLadd on 08/09/11 at 09:07 AM

Page 1 of 1 pages

You are not logged in. To post a comment, you must be a registered user and logged in. Click here to register or click here to log in.

Log in to JFP using Facebook

:: recentcomments

May 22, 2012 | 04:26 PM
One Night at Fenian's
DonnaLadd: ... because if there is anything The Clarion-Ledger can muster the resources to do, it's show up any night of the week and take drunk pictures. Meantime, they crib our sports stories. ...
May 22, 2012 | 03:53 PM
One Night at Fenian's
Rico: Next time just call Metro Mix at the C-L and have them come and take some pretty pictures for the newspaper. Hell, the got some on karaoke night Monday.
May 22, 2012 | 02:07 PM
[Editorial] To Do Its Job, Council Must Show Up
RobbieR: And Chokwe wants to run for Mayor? Hopefully the citizens of Jackson don't fall for this clown's rhetoric.
May 22, 2012 | 01:15 PM
Catholics Sue Over Birth Control Rule
Brian C Johnson: I cannot decide whether this is a vanity lawsuit, in the sense that the bishops know they stand little chance of prevailing in court. Or to put it more charitably, ...
May 22, 2012 | 01:00 PM
Bryant Signs Voter ID Bill
Brian C Johnson: Darryl, I think it is simply a statement of fact that African Americans in Mississippi are less likely to have the required photo ID. If so, the new law is discriminatory in ...
May 22, 2012 | 11:25 AM
Bryant Signs Voter ID Bill
Duan C.: I am in agreement with Golden Eagle - requiring I.D. ties a fee into voting, the only reason why its considered "discriminatory" towards black, is because it places back into an era ...
May 22, 2012 | 10:22 AM
Person of the Day: Rep. Andy Gipson
RobbieR: What? I was clearly referring to Bennie Thompson, not Rep. Gipson. Rep. Bennie Thomson represents Mississippi's 2nd Congressional district; Darryl noted that he rep'd the ...
May 22, 2012 | 09:59 AM
Bryant Signs Voter ID Bill
justjess: Darryl, out of my "simple ignorance" I ask you this "little question:" Why are registered voters here in the State of Mississippi being asked to produce a picture ID? When the State ...
May 22, 2012 | 08:49 AM
Person of the Day: Rep. Andy Gipson
Duan C.: @ Robbie R - you lost me on that one? They have him listed in the 77th District - covering Rankin, Simpson, and Smith counties?
May 22, 2012 | 08:47 AM
Bryant Signs Voter ID Bill
bill_jackson: I would be interested to know what percentage of the voting age population does not have identification in this day and age.
May 22, 2012 | 08:41 AM
[Editorial] To Do Its Job, Council Must Show Up
Duan C.: Hey Kaz, like you and the Mrs said a while back, start grading these jokers based on the same competencies all civil servants across the state get graded on: ...
May 22, 2012 | 05:14 AM
Bryant Signs Voter ID Bill
Darryl: Golden, I agree with the sense that this is essentially a poll tax. But it's a poll tax that'll be paid by all of the tax-paying Mississippians, not just those registering or wishing ...
May 21, 2012 | 05:48 PM
Bryant Signs Voter ID Bill
golden eagle: @Darryl, since you asked...it's essentially a poll tax. If a person doesn't have an ID, then they'd have to pay money to get one. If they don't have a copy of a birth ...
May 21, 2012 | 03:50 PM
JPS Accreditation Hearing Underway
lizwaibel: JPS interim Superintendent Jayne Sargent has issued a statement via email on the commission's decision: "We are absolutely thrilled with the Commission's response to our ...
May 21, 2012 | 02:29 PM
JPS Accreditation Hearing Underway
lizwaibel: Other media are reporting that JPS will not lose its accreditation and has until November to resolve its noncompliance issues.

100 recent comments »

 


click to view "flip" version of this week's print issue

 

Guests online: 152
Logged-in members: 1
Anonymous members: 0
Elapsed time: 1.1657
The most number of visitors ever was 1961 at once on 03/27/2012
currently online: kudzuking

 

© Jackson Free Press, Inc. - portions of code by CC with EE. User agreement and privacy statement.
phone: 601-362-6121 (ext 11 sales, ext 16 editorial, ext 17 publisher)
fax: 601-510-9019 * P.O. Box 5067 * Jackson, MS * 39296